Working on an idea for a simple HTMLElement wrapper I stumbled upon the following for Internet Explorer and Chrome:
For a given HTMLElement with an id in the DOM tree, it is possible to retrieve the <div> using its ID as a variable name or as a property of window. So for a <div> like
<div id="example">some text</div>
in Internet Explorer 8 and Chrome you can do:
alert(example.innerHTML); // Alerts "some text".
or
alert(window["example"].innerHTML); // Alerts "some text".
So, does this mean every element in the DOM tree is converted to a property on the global object? And does it also mean one can use this as a replacement for the getElementById method in these browsers?
ベストアンサー1
What is supposed to happen is that ‘named elements’ are added as apparent properties of the document object. This is a really bad idea, as it allows element names to clash with real properties of document.
IE made the situation worse by also adding named elements as properties of the window object. This is doubly bad in that now you have to avoid naming your elements after any member of either the document or the window object you (or any other library code in your project) might want to use.
It also means that these elements are visible as global-like variables. Luckily in this case any real global var or function declarations in your code shadow them, so you don't need to worry so much about naming here, but if you try to do an assignment to a global variable with a clashing name and you forget to declare it var, you'll get an error in IE as it tries to assign the value to the element itself.
It's generally considered bad practice to omit var, as well as to rely on named elements being visible on window or as globals. Stick to document.getElementById, which is more widely-supported and less ambiguous. You can write a trivial wrapper function with a shorter name if you don't like the typing. Either way, there's no point in using an id-to-element lookup cache, because browsers typically optimise the getElementById call to use a quick lookup anyway; all you get is problems when elements change id or are added/removed from the document.
Opera copied IE, then WebKit joined in, and now both the previously-unstandardised practice of putting named elements on document properties, and the previously-IE-only practice of putting them on window are being standardised by HTML5, whose approach is to document and standardise every terrible practice inflicted on us by browser authors, making them part of the web forever. So Firefox 4 will also support this.
「名前付き要素」とは何でしょうか? の付いたものid、および のname付いたものは「識別」の目的で使用されます。つまり、フォーム、画像、アンカーなどですが、nameフォーム入力フィールドのコントロール名、 のパラメータ名、<param>のメタデータ タイプなど、属性の他の無関係なインスタンスは識別に使用されません<meta>。「識別」nameは避けて を使用してくださいid。